Search for: "Proper v. State"
Results 441 - 460
of 22,871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 1:21 pm
In addition to the one patent case (Helsinn), the Supreme Court also has one Copyright case lined-up for its October 2018 term: Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
“The only remaining question, then, is whether Indiana’s law is rationally related to the state’s interest in proper disposal of fetal remains. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 6:39 am
” According to Activision, the case implicates federal copyright law, and thus federal court (rather than state court) is the proper place for the litigation. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 7:41 am
In Demore v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 8:21 am
The court cites to Calder v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 7:57 pm
The Utah Supreme Court has issued its decision in the case Haik v. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 1:31 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
State v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 11:05 pm
It is the failure of the trial court to ask the questions on the amended voir dire request that is the subject of this appeal.In Maryland, the sole purpose of voir dire is to ensure a fair and impartial jury by determining the existence of cause for disqualification and not, as in many other states, to include the intelligent exercise of preemptory challenges. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:33 am
State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm
By Herron Bond In Ulloa v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 5:33 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:23 pm
Head is a split opinion that is reminiscent of United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 12:08 am
The opinion relies on out-of-state authorities reaching the same result. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:50 pm
Neff and State Farm, May Term 2009 No. 2487 (Phila. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:51 am
Defendants challenged the availability of equitable restitution pursuant to Section 13(b) of the FTCA, which states “[t]hat in proper cases the Commission may seek, and after proper proof, the court may issue, a permanent injunction. [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:22 am
Regina (HRH Sultan of Pahang) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 616; [2011] WLR (D) 183 “The question of who was a head of state such as to attract state immunity was a matter for the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and not for the court. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 2:30 pm
” United States v. [read post]
