Search for: "RICHARDSON v. US "
Results 441 - 460
of 1,031
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2016, 11:10 am
The US Department of Labor (DOL) is appealing the November 22 Nevada v US Department of Labor ruling preliminarily enjoining DOL from implementing or enforcing a modification to the DOL Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) White Collar Exemption Regulations that would have nearly doubled the minimum salary that an employer must pay an employee on a salaried basis in reliance on the White Collar Exemption. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 12:52 pm
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the biggest takings case of the year, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
(citing Foley v. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 10:04 pm
Richardson, 949 F.2d 851, 859 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 10:57 am
Richardson, No. 09-4072 (4th Cir. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 8:53 am
For example, this draft argues that it is the first to consider out of court settlements, but Lemley, Richardson and Oliver circulated a draft of comprehensive survey results in 2017. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:17 am
Richardson, 384 U.S. 73, 93 (1966), the Court noted that states may have leeway to use a population basis other than the Census, but only if the resulting plan is not “substantially different” than one based on population. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:17 am
Richardson, 384 U.S. 73, 93 (1966), the Court noted that states may have leeway to use a population basis other than the Census, but only if the resulting plan is not “substantially different” than one based on population. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 9:41 am
Richardson v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Richardson (1966), the Court said it was up to states to choose what population to use “unless a choice is one the Constitution forbids. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Land Use & Envtl. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 12:08 am
” Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:56 am
Richardson v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Richardson and the other modern sex discrimination precedents are wrong? [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:53 am
”) (quoting In re Richardson Ink Co., 511 F.2d 559, 561 (CCPA 1975)). [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 12:30 pm
Today's post picks up reviews of a new book on Eugene Debs and History News Network's Rick Shenkman's unflattering take on the American voter.Democracy's Prisoner: Eugene V. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 9:34 pm
The case is Richardson v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:47 pm
What the Court’s holding means is that EPA may not use a sources emissions of GHGs as the basis for subjecting that source to PSD and Title V requirements. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:13 am
[11] Richardson v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:29 am
That brings us to this week’s three-ish new relists. [read post]
