Search for: "ROBERT ROE" Results 441 - 460 of 1,251
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2022, 5:12 am by SHG
If the Court took the public’s approval into account, would there have been a Roe v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 6:59 am by James Romoser
Colb, Dorf on Law) Sarah Weddington, Who Successfully Argued Roe v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 2:44 pm by Ram Eachambadi | JURIST Staff
Supreme Court decision allowing Texas’s ban on most abortion services to remain in place, and largely endorsing Texas’s scheme to insulate its law from the fundamental protections of Roe v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 3:39 pm by Josh Blackman
Supreme Court, which can decide whether it wants to re-affirm Roe v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 6:30 am by Steve Shiffrin
When Chief Justice Roberts said a Supreme Court justice was like an umpire calling balls and strikes, he was way off the mark. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:11 am by Amy Howe
That is a clear conflict with the Supreme Court’s landmark decisions in Roe v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:59 am by David Oscar Markus
The Bill of Rights and the 14th Amendment exist to put some issues off limits for majority rule — as Justice Robert H. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
 Yet, during the Dobbs argument, the conservative Justices seemed to just assume that Roe and Casey were incorrect and argued instead about whether viability is an appropriate or arbitrary line (Roberts), whether changes in adoption access undercut abortion jurisprudence (Barrett), and whether the states could criminalize reckless behavior by pregnant women (Thomas). [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 1:11 pm by Sophia Cope
Hopkinton Public Schools, involved a student, “Robert Roe,” who was bullied by teammates on his hockey team. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
He referred to Roe as “settled law” and to Casey as “precedent on precedent. [read post]