Search for: "Reade v. C. I. R" Results 441 - 460 of 2,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2013, 12:38 am by J
I confess to being a bit surprised by how much interest it has generated as I can’t see that it says anything much that is “new”:(a) in domestic law, this wouldn’t (necessarily) have been a case about the Directive/Regulations at all; a clause like this is so obviously a penalty clause (i.e. not a genuine pre-estimate of loss) that it’d be unenforceable at common law;(b) there is already plenty of domestic authority for the proposition that the… [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:50 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
The additional sentence read: “By rejecting this coverage, I am also signing the waiver on P. 13 rejecting stacked limits of underinsured motorist coverage. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The present decision suggests that there are special cases where it does not.Claim 1 of the divisional application refused by the Examining Division (ED) read:1. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:31 am by Steve Delchin
Last year, I posted a widely read article about ethics and professionalism in the Sixth Circuit that explored the myriad ethical duties belonging to appellate lawyers, including the duty of candor, the duty to disclose adverse authority, and the duty of competence. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In his s.19 examination by ASIC, Mr Shao said (through an interpreter): “… I was completely dependent to the two Australian directors and I depended on their profession to manage this and I don’t really know the Australian policies about disclosure and I was totally dependent on the two directors. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:54 pm by CoL .net
It would be useful to borrow from Steven Chong, J’s reading of the doctrine in BCY v BCZ, which is also a case of the Singapore High Court that applied the composite approach of Sulamerica. [read post]