Search for: "Research in Motion Ltd" Results 441 - 460 of 697
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am by INFORRM
The motion judge, Belobaba, J. disagreed and dismissed the defendants’ motion and held that the Ontario court had jurisdiction over the actions and Ontario was the convenient and appropriate forum. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am by Marie Louise
Graco Children’s Products Inc (Docket Report) Hewlett-Packard – ALJ Rogers rules on motion for sanctions in Certain Inkjet Ink Cartridges with Printheads (337-TA-723) (ITC Law Blog) (ITC Law Blog) Horizon Hobby, Inc – ITC institutes investigation (337-TA-763) regarding Certain Radio Control Hobby Transmitters and Receivers (ITC Law Blog) Itex – ‘Downstream Sales Information’ not relevant to reasonable royalty or lost profits: Itex, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) and the Respondents are Research In Motion, Ltd., Research In Motion Corporation (collectively, “RIM”), and Apple Inc. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:58 pm by Doug
A top executive of BlackBerry-maker Research in Motion Ltd. said Indian security agencies are making “rather astonishing” demands for increased powers to monitor email and other data traffic, raising serious privacy issues that threaten to harm the country’s reputation with foreign investors. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:37 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  Respondents Nokia Corp., Nokia, Inc., Research in Motion Ltd., Research in Motion Corp., HTC Corp., HTC America, Inc., LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:59 am by Marie Louise
– FCAFC decision in Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd v Overliese (IP Whiteboard)   Caribbean Carribean IP: Establishing an arbitral tribunal for the region (IP Watch) Canada Petition launched in opposition to CETA (Michael Geist) Clerical error in the Intellectual Property Office: Repligen Corp. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Judge Kaplan also denied Infosint's motion to increase the $15 million reasonable royalty award to $43 million by adding additional damages and interest.The CAFC affirmed the SDNY decision on March 11, 2011.The SDNY decision had cited Integra:See Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:47 pm by Marie Louise
Hitachi Ltd., et. al (Docket Report) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Analog Devices – ITC decides to review in part initial determination in Certain MEMS Devices (337-TA-700) (ITC Law Blog) Apple – ALJ Rogers rules on motions to compel, motions to strike and motions for summary determination in Certain Digital Imaging Devices And Related Software (337-TA-717) (ITC 337 Law Blog) Cisco – Petition for writ of mandamus denied in… [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am by Ray Dowd
Examples of fair use include commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching, library archiving and scholarship. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:59 am by Marie Louise
Highlights this week included: Slammed by judge, ACS:Law not allowed to drop file-sharing cases: Media C.A.T. v Adams (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) (1709 Copyright Blog) (The Bright Spark) (Techdirt) Competition trumps IP in footie decoder pub brawl: Football Association Premier League Ltd & Others v QC Leisure & Others, Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (IPKat) (1709 Blog) (1709 Blog) (IPKat) (Azrights) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any… [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:53 am
Authorities contend nearly $6 million in illegal profits were generated through trades in some of the nation's leading tech companies, including Apple Inc., Advanced Micro Devices Inc, Dell Inc, and Research in Motion Ltd., the maker or Blackberry. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 12:55 pm by Doug
India and BlackBerry maker Research In Motion Ltd. are in a deadlock over the issue of monitoring corporate emails as the world’s fastest growing market for wireless services insists the Canadian smartphone maker provide it access. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 10:23 am by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) and the Respondents are Research In Motion, Ltd., Research In Motion Corporation (collectively, “RIM”), and Apple Inc. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 11:58 am by Richard Renner
Accenture Ltd, 537 F.Supp2d 506 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) and Rayna v. [read post]