Search for: "Rules of Evidence v. Rules"
Results 441 - 460
of 59,362
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2024, 5:22 pm
” Rosen v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:55 pm
Last October, I wrote a long post on a new Tenth Circuit decision, United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:41 pm
As suggested here, Wood v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:08 am
Veterans Joshua Bufkin and Norman Thornton were each denied benefits despite evidence that appeared to be in “approximate balance. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:35 am
The only evidence against defendant was the complainants’ testimony, and the result of the court’s rulings, on the one hand, was to bolster their credibility and diminish defendant’s character before the jury. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
The regulation is part of an effort to preserve the reproductive rights of women in the aftermath of the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
On April 5, 2024, a jury in California federal court found a former corporate executive liable for insider trading in SEC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld that ruling. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm
Rule 4-3.3: Candor Toward the Tribunal states: False Evidence; Duty to Disclose. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:48 am
Last month, in Woodard v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:36 am
The material facts in the case were similar to those in Leo v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:52 am
Circuit Court of Appeals’ AMA v FTC case from 1980). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:28 am
ShareThe oral argument Tuesday in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:47 am
Y Michael Yin, JD Hunter v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:37 am
The trial court also ruled against Applied on the issue of willfulness, without sending the issue to the jury. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:45 am
In its decision of 14 March 2024, in Prefamac and others v Autodesk and others, the Supreme Court of Belgium found that if a Court rules that a saisie should not have been authorised, the order granting such a saisie should be annulled and the effects of this annulment should also extend to the evidence obtained. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:52 am
As such, the Labour Court ruled that their dismissals were fair and should stand. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:52 am
As such, the Labour Court ruled that their dismissals were fair and should stand. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Last week, Judge Rosenstengel found Wells’ opinion so infected by invalid methodologies and inferences as to be inadmissible under the most recent version of Rule 702.[1] Summary judgment in the trial cases followed.[2] Back in the 1980s, paraquat gained some legal notoriety in one of the most retrograde Rule 702 decisions.[3] Both the herbicide and Rule 702, however, and they remain in wide use. [read post]
