Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 441 - 460
of 62,634
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2008, 2:50 am
Casewell v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; [2008] WLR (D) 86 “A direct payment of carer's allowance made to a disabled person for securing the provision of care by her husband formed part of the husband's earnings for the purposes of assessing his entitlement to income support. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 2:20 am
Louca v Public Prosecutor, Bielefeld [2009] UKSC 4; [2009] WLR (D) 337 "To satisfy the requirements of s 2 of the Extradition Act 2003 a European arrest warrant only had to make reference to the requesting state’s domestic arrest warrant on which it was based and not to any previous European arrest warrant, based on the [...] [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 2:17 am
Ugiagbe v Southwark London Borough Council [2009] EWCA Civ 31; [2009] WLR (D) 47 “A person's failure to go to the Homeless Persons Unit for advice before leaving accommodation which she occupied did not amount to a lack of "good faith" for the purposes of s 191(2) of the Housing Act 1996 rendering her intentionally homeless. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 5:26 pm
Of interest in 3Form v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 12:59 pm
See Gabelli v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 4:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:34 pm
(See, Ghory v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 11:45 am
Salazar (D. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 11:45 am
Salazar (D. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 2:44 am
Hovell v Ashford & St Peter's Hospital NHS Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 670; [2009] WLR (D) 237 “An independent expert report as to equal value was not always necessary before an employment tribunal could determine an equal value pay claim based on the contents of a job evaluation scheme (’JES’). [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 10:18 am
Egan v Central Manchester and Manchester Children's University Hospitals NHS Trust [2008] EWCA Civ 1424; [2008] WLR (D) 394 “Once an employee had shown that a manual handling operation at work carried some risk of injury, for the purposes of reg 4(1)(b) of the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992, the burden of proof was on the [...] [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:40 am
R (Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd) v Wolverhampton City Council [2010] UKSC 20; [2010] WLR (D) 123 “A planning authority, in considering the exercise of its compulsory purchase powers in relation to one site, was not entitled to take into account a commitment by a developer to secure the redevelopment of another unconnected site. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 9:21 am
Cir. 1995) (en banc), aff'd, 517 U.S. 370 (1996); see also Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 2:09 am
Finnerty and another v Clark and another; In re St George’s Property Services (London) Ltd (in administration) [2011] EWCA Civ 858; [2011] WLR (D) 246 “The administrators of an insolvent company were the officers of the court with statutory powers to exercise their discretion to act for the interests of the creditors as a whole. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 1:49 am
Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council v Fidler and others [2010] EWHC 2430 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 244 “The definition of ‘private hire vehicle’ in s 80(1) of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976, with its express exclusion of hackney carriages, had to be read into the references to ‘private hire vehicle’ in sections 46(1)(d)(e); and the words ‘hackney carriage’, where they appeared in s 80(1), were… [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 2:14 pm
The post D. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:43 am
Key Insight: Privileged docs based on only state law must be produced in a case with both federal and state claims Nature of Case: Medical malpractice Electronic Data Involved: Responsive documents Keywords: Privilege, state law Identified State Rule(s): K.S.A. section 65-4925(a) Identified Federal Rule(s): FRCP 26(b) [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 9:34 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:38 am
TRM Copy Centres (UK) Ltd and others v Lanwall Services Ltd [2009] UKHL35; [2009] WLR (D) 190 “An agreement between the provider of photocopiers and the retailer in whose premises the photocopiers were located was not a consumer hire agreement within the meaning of s 15 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 if there was no [...] [read post]
