Search for: "S.B. V. STATE"
Results 441 - 460
of 603
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
The Court did not take center stage by deciding the constitutional challenges we are watching most closely: the cases involving the health care reform statute, Arizona’s S.B. 1070 immigration law, or the upcoming dispute on California’s Proposition 8 on gay marriage. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether federal immigration laws impliedly preempt Arizona’s controversial S.B. 1070. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 1:59 am
See generally United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 10:13 pm
See generally United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 6:08 am
United States: Federal Plenary Power, the Spheres of Government, and the Constitutionality of S.B. 1070" Cleveland State Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 1, 2012 PATRICK J. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:19 am
. --- #6 - Haro v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:30 am
United States: Federal Plenary Power, the Spheres of Government, and the Constitutionality of S.B. 1070 (Cleveland State Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 1, 2012) on SSRN. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
Among other things, S.B. 1070 makes it a crime for an undocumented immigrant to apply for a job or to be in the state without valid immigration papers. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 12:00 am
OH - STATE v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
In the wake of the Court’s announcement that it will review S.B. 1070, Arizona’s immigration law, several states with similar laws have asked the lower federal courts to put challenges to those laws on hold pending the Court’s decision. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:50 am
I then address the implications for S.B. 1070 and state and local copycat laws of the Supreme Court’s and lower federal courts’ apparent willingness to uphold state laws modeled after federal law when enacted to redress a gap in federal enforcement. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:48 pm
United States, the pending case that will resolve whether Arizona’s S.B. 1070 is preempted by federal immigration law. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
United States and concludes that if the Court strikes down S.B. 1070, “it will reaffirm the well established principle that immigration policy is exclusively a federal matter; inextricably tied to the idea of the United States as a sovereign nation. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:15 am
At the Volokh Conspiracy Orin Kerr weighs in on some of the Chief Justice’s questions during last month’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 1:15 pm
United States, the lawsuit concerning the constitutionality of the state’s controversial immigration enforcement measure S.B. 1070. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:26 am
United States, in which the state has asked it to overturn the lower courts’ decisions blocking enforcement of four provisions of its controversial immigration law, S.B. 1070. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:48 pm
Cert granted today in Arizon v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:18 am
United States (No. 11-182), the state’s appeal of an April 2011 opinion by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that blocked implementation of several key provisions in the law popularly known at “S.B. 1070. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:09 am
In urging Supreme Court review, the state’s petition (Arizona v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
United States (Granted )Docket: 11-182Issue(s): Whether federal immigration laws preclude Arizona's efforts at cooperative law enforcement and impliedly preempt four provisions of S.B. 1070 on their face. [read post]
