Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF B. J. and J. J." Results 441 - 460 of 4,643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
COIB Case No. 2013-258The New York City Conflicts of Interest Board (COIB) adopted in full OATH Administrative Law Judge Kara J. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 2:57 am by Diane Tweedlie
It was stated that correction of a mistake was an isolated procedural measure and not a case of re-establishment into a defined procedural phase as a whole (see J 27/96, Reasons 3.2). [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 8:12 pm
Given its obvious pro-Howard government spin and appreciating the laws of political advertising, this ad piqued my interest. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:10 am by Stephen Bilkis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:28 am
§ 271(e)(4)(B), HEC Pharm be permanently enjoined from making, using, selling or offering to sell any of its accused products within the United States, or, where applicable, importing accused products into the United States prior to the expiration of the '703 patent;• That, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 3:20 am
The case may at first appear to be one that is only of interest to real EPO case law aficionados. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 10:11 am by Ray Dowd
SOFTWARE COPYRIGHT - SCREEN SHOTS - PLEADING INFRINGEMENT - RULE 12(B)6 - SOFTWARE CODE - COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTManitoba HydroA Star Group, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:02 am
Philippe Sands, Conflict of Interest for Arbitrators and/or Counsel Toby Landau & Romesh Weeramantry, A Case for Transparency in Investment Arbitration J. [read post]
21 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Introduction Speech act theory will forever be associated with the great J. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 7:20 am by Kenan Farrell
Court Case Number: 1:19-cv-1492File Date: Monday, April 15, 2019Plaintiff: Indie Game Studios, LLC d/b/a Stronghold Games LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Patrick J. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm by Thomas Surmanski
Gonthier J. made a similar point on behalf of the SCC in R v Jones, [1994] 2 SCR 229 – “As with all sentencing, both the public interest in safety and the general sentencing interest of developing the most appropriate penalty for the particular offender dictate the greatest possible range of information on which to make an accurate evaluation of the danger posed by the offender” (at para. 124). [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 12:19 pm
In a matter of first impression, Justice John Hedigan of the High Court of Ireland (a trial court) has ruled in J. [read post]