Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF C. C."
Results 441 - 460
of 27,513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2016, 12:01 am
” John C. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 10:05 am
In the Thick of the Battlefield for America's Economic Soul; Alvin C. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 1:48 pm
Tennessee and New Hampshire tax interest and dividend income but not wage income. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:15 pm
Should C predecease B, the 1/3 tenancy in common interest will pass through C’s estate and B will be the sole owner of an undivided 2/3 interest in Blackacre as the survivor of the joint tenancy. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Although not expressly stated in the bench ruling, the absence of other potential bidders emerging over a five-month period appears, at least in part, to have led the Court to make a “relatively modest” adjustment to the deal by enjoining the stockholder vote for 30 days, during which time the C&J board “shall solicit interest. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 1:00 am
It would be interesting to see how the referral questions are phrased by the Court of Appeal and whether the referral is joined with any pending one. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:06 am
EUR 25,000.- plus interest and costs. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Loewy, Elizabeth Sepper, Christopher C. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 7:18 am
So, for fun, try to revise Bill C-377 to better achieve the stated purpose of the law: to require full public disclose by organizations that receive “public funding” in the form of subsidies or special tax benefits, including unions, but also the many other organizations that also receive ‘public funding’, including charities, businesses, and professional associations. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:34 am
C 09-03628 SI, 2009 WL 3809816 (N.D. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:52 pm
Hopefully, parties will put best interests of children ahead of short term animosity. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:03 am
Rumpf and Assemblywoman DiAnne C. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 1:37 pm
Peck, Clerk of the Commission, c/o Document Control Center, P.O. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 10:23 am
C-26 is not identical to US national security laws. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 8:52 am
While these concerns could, in many cases, be dismissed as purely academic, Case C-800/19 Mittelbayerischer Verlag seems to put them back on the agenda in a politically somewhat delicate context. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:44 pm
Re Nathanson, 1946 CanLII 104 (ON SC), [1946] O.R. 421 (H.C.).[85] Some Canadian cases that have applied a 5% rate appear simply to have been mimicking the English practice of the day, while others tie the rate of interest expressly or by implication to the legal interest rate provided for in s. 3 of the Interest Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 3:01 am
Toomey, citing School District 6 v NYSHRB, 35 NY2d 371, said that such a personnel policy, even if the product of negotiations under [the Taylor Law] would violate the State’s Human Rights Law and is therefore a prohibited subject of negotiations.* See Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 5:00 pm
This raises an interesting question: what exactly was the method used by the ECJ in this case? [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 3:13 pm
My question must be answered correctly if we want the United States Trade Representative (USTR ), which is charged with negotiating TPP and TTIP on behalf of the United States, to be fully and completely informed. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 12:45 pm
§ 3553(c)(2) for above-Guideline sentences. [read post]
