Search for: "STATE v. FLOYD"
Results 441 - 460
of 842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2012, 11:45 am
On July 26, 2012, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals decided WEC Carolina Energy Solutions LLC v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:54 pm
PPV viewers in at least six states have filed putative class action lawsuits arising out of the recent “Fight of the Century” between Floyd Mayweather, Jr. and Manny Pacquiao. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:48 pm
Park v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 3:11 am
Floyd, and joined by Senior Circuit Judge Andre M. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
The tabloid accused Headley of being a “cosmetic cowboy”, falsely stating that she had botched the treatment of customers. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
Under U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm
” (…) Glaser Weil’s argument focused on MDQ, LLC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm
One of the Legislature’s stated purposes in amending Section 90.702 was “to adopt the standards for expert testimony in the courts of this state as provided in Daubert v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
AbbVie also argued that since Arrow was decided nine years ago, the appellate courts have been more willing to permit EPO procedures to take their course without English judicial interference (see Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors UK Ltd [2013] UK SC 46; [2014] A.C. 160, as summarised by Floyd LJ in IPcom GmbH & Co KG v HTC Europe Co Ltd & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 1496; [2014] R.P.C. 12.)Carr J rejected these… [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 1:06 pm
More on Atkins v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 7:21 am
The case is entitled Ok et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:09 pm
See Viceroy v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 2:27 pm
From Murphy v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 11:44 am
New Albany-Floyd County Consolidated School Corporation, et al. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
Floyd, 251 F. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
In his reference, the Judge trotted through the English court's and CJEU's case law Article 3(a) - Takeda, Farmitalia, Daiichi, Yeda, Medeva (and its progeny), Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lilly v HGS, Actavis v Boehringer, - and found that it was clear that something more was required, but what that "something" was was not clear. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 3:47 am
” At the NCSL Blog, Lisa Soronen analyzes the recent summary decision in Mullenix v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:20 am
V for victory sign introduced. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 12:09 pm
Under this theory which the Supreme Court addressed in Universal Health Service v. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 12:09 pm
Under this theory which the Supreme Court addressed in Universal Health Service v. [read post]
