Search for: "Smith's Case" Results 441 - 460 of 30,022
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The federal prosecutor leading the case, Special Counsel Jack Smith, had not issued any statement at the time this article was written. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:31 pm by Amy Howe
The Supreme Court instructed Smith to file his response on Feb. 20, signaling that the justices did not necessarily regard the case as a true emergency. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:07 pm by admin
As for the authors’ professed concern about “rule of law,” readers should note that the Jurs and DeVito article completely ignores the remedial amendment to Rule 702, which went into effect on December 1, 2023, to address the myriad inconsistencies, and failures to engage, in required gatekeeping of expert witness opinion testimony.[10] The new Rule 702 is now law, with its remedial clarification that the proponent of expert witness opinion must show the court that the opinion is… [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 11:47 am by Adam Klasfeld
In the 2020 election case in D.C., the final form of the gag order approved by an appellate court allowed Trump to attack Special Counsel Smith, not his assistants. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:44 am by Dan Bressler
” “The plaintiffs asked the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas to bar Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith from continuing to represent Segway in their suit, which was still awaiting rulings on whether it could sever the claims against Spin so the rest of the case could move forward amid the bankruptcy court’s automatic stay. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:02 am by Reference Staff
” The US Supreme Court opined about the lack of jury diversity as early as 1940 in Smith v. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Gene Takagi
Trumpeted Now-Discredited Allegation Against Biden Republicans in Congress built their impeachment case against President Biden around a bribery accusation that the F.B.I. had warned them was uncorroborated. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm by John Elwood
But be forewarned that the Supreme Court does a careful review in capital cases, and the factbound nature of this case candidly has a bit of a “due diligence” feel rather than a suggestion that the case involves an issue of overriding legal importance. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:46 am by Tom Smith
There are eerie commonalities in all these five court cases involving plaintiff E. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:25 am by Holly
February 23, 2024 |  By: Thomas Dunlap   The Supreme Court’s decision to grant certiorari in Wendy Smith et al. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:36 am by Beatrice Yahia
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]