Search for: "Smith v. Grant et al"
Results 441 - 460
of 465
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2011, 2:38 pm
“WELLS FARGO's Requests for Judicial Notice are granted. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Devine, Jon, et al. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 3:43 am
In the landmark case of Huizhou Weitong Real Estate Co., Ltd v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:52 pm
Abril is attempting to move away from the traditional privacy tort analysis, perhaps the original Restatement language stating that the disclosed information must be "highly offensive to a reasonable person" would be appropriate here in order to give the court some kind of benchmark for what degree of harm must be involved in order for the court to grant relief. [24] In addition, perhaps the size of the audience to which the information was disclosed may be considered. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm
In Borealis Power Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:57 am
The refusal cites documentsD1: TSAI D-M ET AL: "The evaluation of normalized cross correlations for defect detection", PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, ELSEVIER, AMSTERDAM, NL, vol. 24, no. 15, November 2003, pages 2525-2535D2: TSAI D-M ET AL: "Fast normalized cross correlation for defect detection", PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, ELSEVIER, AMSTERDAM, NL, vol. 24, no. 15, November 2003, pages 2625-2631D3: R. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm
Rehana Ahmed-Saucedo, Sonal Singh, and Feng Liu-Smith. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 9:09 pm
Webster et. al., Changes in Tropical Cyclone Number, Duration, and Intensity in a Warming Environment 309 Science 1844 (2005)). [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 9:09 pm
Webster et. al., Changes in Tropical Cyclone Number, Duration, and Intensity in a Warming Environment 309 Science 1844 (2005)). [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 9:09 pm
Webster et. al., Changes in Tropical Cyclone Number, Duration, and Intensity in a Warming Environment 309 Science 1844 (2005)). [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am
Granted, the extent of negotiations between the corporation and nonshareholders is likely to vary widely. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:35 am
Back in 2001, in the aftermath of the silicone gel breast implant litigation, I participated in a Federal Judicial Center (FJC) television production of “Science in the Courtroom, program 6” (2001). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
And time and again, those courts determined that the transactions at issue—ranging from investment opportunities in oil barrels to fishing boats to silver foxes—did in fact constitute the offer or sale of securities.[8] And then in 1946, the Supreme Court issued its seminal opinion in SEC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Complaint ¶ 1, Alianza Americas v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
” Appellants [Judith Miller et al.] argue that “this proposition of law is flatly contrary to the great weight of authority in this and other circuits. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
The Court issued two decisions related to the timeliness of securities claims, and granted certiorari to consider a third in 2018. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
[This is a version of a letter I sent to the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property today to call attention to various discrepancies in the proposed witness list, especially the presence of the Pirate Party at a hearing at the world’s greatest deliberative body. [read post]
