Search for: "Smith v. Grant et al"
Results 441 - 460
of 495
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2009, 9:28 am
A case study, or even data gleaned from briefs filed in school speech cases, would have been helpful to a reader seeking to gauge the size of the costs schools bear as a result of Tinker et al. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
The opening salvo came in the form of the Supreme Court's grant of certiorari to the Third Circuit case of Forum for Academic & Institutional Rights (FAIR) v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 11:30 pm
[16] Natalie Huls et al, International Legal Updates, 14 Hum. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:52 pm
Harlow v. [read post]
25 Sep 2021, 2:36 pm
Jacobson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:40 am
Stuart, 427 US 539 (1976), Smith v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Smith v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
Roberts, et al., Respondents, vTishman Speyer Properties, L.P., et al., Appellants. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:46 pm
Kappos et al., Case No. 2010-1534, perhaps starting (or ending) another chapter in the saga over a Patent Term Extension (“PTE”) for U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
See Jan Rigby, et al., “Can physical trauma cause breast cancer? [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
On 1 November 2022, there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:44 pm
., the Court will hold a one-hour oral argument in the case of Schwarzenegger, et al., v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:01 am
Omnibuses as classified by R.S.39:3-10.1 and school buses classified under N.J.S.18A:39-1 et seq. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 11:08 pm
No. 3538 and Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:02 am
Catherine Martin Christopher, et. al., Will I Pass the Bar Exam? [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 10:44 am
Smith, whose testimony has been the subject of several judicial exclusions for lack of validity. [7] Lorillard, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
