Search for: "State of Maine v. Cross"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2011, 8:35 am
36, At the hearing of the main appeal, I referred to the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-62/00 Marks & Spencer v IRC. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 8:46 am
In Kane v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:01 pm
I find the issue of the assessment of evidence of extreme importance for two main reasons. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 7:01 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 11:36 am
In State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
As appellant’s counsel states, this portrayal shifted the focus of the jury to the appellant’s negative character traits, rather than to the main issues of the trial. [35] The respondents’ trial counsel assured the judge all the documents in the Exhibit would be referred to in the cross-examination of Ms. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 7:54 am
The new case is called Michela v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:05 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:11 pm
” Specifically, the Petition for Rehearing En Banc, filed July 13, 2021, asserts that “upholding the Panel decision would needlessly create a circuit split on whether a class of workers must physically cross state lines to be ‘engaged in commerce’ under the FAA’s Section 1 . . . exemption,” citing Waithaka v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:11 pm
” Specifically, the Petition for Rehearing En Banc, filed July 13, 2021, asserts that “upholding the Panel decision would needlessly create a circuit split on whether a class of workers must physically cross state lines to be ‘engaged in commerce’ under the FAA’s Section 1 . . . exemption,” citing Waithaka v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 2:09 pm
Selya says it is okay under prejudice and notes that under United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 10:24 am
Both small and large drug trafficking operations that cross state borders can be charged in a federal indictment. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 2:17 am
- Asolo v Red Bull | Questioning the trade mark judges [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
Both Argentina and Paraguay are Contracting States to the American Convention on Human Rights (or Pact of San José) and the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, which are the main instruments assessed by the Inter-American Court and Commission. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm
P. 8(a) adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:28 am
Another way was suggested by the 8th District last week in State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:44 am
.'” “Law Firm Hack Affects Victims of an Earlier Breach Again” — “Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe on July 20 reported the data breach to several state regulators, including the attorneys general of Maine and California, as well as a HIPAA breach to the U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 1:10 pm
In People v Lester (N.Y. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:59 am
(in English) The Grand Chamber judgment in the Naït-Liman v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:12 pm
This may have been the case in United States v. [read post]
