Search for: "State v. C.J." Results 441 - 460 of 737
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
For example, the Supreme Court had held that an LPA is maintainable against a judgment given by a single judge under: (a) s. 76(1) of the Trademarks Act, 1940 (National Sewing Thread Co v James Chadwick—a three-judge Bench); (b) s. 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (Vinita Khanolkar v Pai—a two-judge Bench); (c) s. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Sharda Devi v State of Bihar—a three-judge Bench); (d) s. 299 of the Indian Succession Act,… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 10:26 am by Aaron Bruhl
United States, 497 U.S. 543, 545 (1990) (Rehnquist, C.J., joined by O’Connor, Scalia, and Kennedy, JJ., dissenting). [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:44 am by Yvonne Daly
Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11 centred on the constitutionality of s.29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act 1939, as amended by s.5 of the Criminal Law Act 1976. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:51 am
I would affirm the trial court's order.In State of Indiana v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:32 am by SHG
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]