Search for: "State v. Community Distributors" Results 441 - 460 of 565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2011, 8:18 am
 Today, in Case T-508/08 Bang & Olufsen v OHIM, it has rejected another unpromising appeal, this time against an attempt to register the seductively desirable shape of a Bang & Olufsen speaker. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 7:28 pm by Chris Castle
Owner shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon sixty (60) days written notice to Distributor if the Force Majeure Event affecting Distributor is not prevalent throughout the recording industry in the United States and continues for one hundred and eighty (180) days. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 7:12 am by Steve Szentesi
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 11:54 am by admin
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
“Stewards” of personal data should expect demanding requirements but with the hope for a federal standard that could lead to greater harmonization of the existing state-by-state patchwork. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV,… [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Caroline Lee
In the spirit of helping public agencies better serve their communities, RPLG routinely holds training programs. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 17 – Copyright Substantial Similarity Crossprogrammed with my panel; I came here first because I had more experience with the first paper in the other panel. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Abuelhawa, No. 07-4639 A conviction and sentence for knowingly and intentionally using a communication facility for drug distribution is affirmed where: 1) a person's status as a facilitator alone can give rise to criminal liability regardless of the status as a buyer or distributor; and 2) the government presented sufficient evidence of drug distribution to support the jury verdict. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 12:02 pm
  Defendant was a distributor who was involved in actual assembly, packaging, and promotion of the device. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm by Schachtman
Omalu’s stated methodology in this case is generally accepted in the medical and scientific community, Dr. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
  Colombia Colombian trade marks just got a little slower (IP tango)   Croatia Simplified process for renewing customs watch applications, from 1 January 2009 (Class 46)   Europe European Court of Justice rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference: Verein Radetzky-Orden v Bundesvereinigung Kameradschaft ‘Feldmarschall Radetzky’ (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI decides BARBARA BECKER confusingly similar to earlier Community trade mark… [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:24 am
Every few weeks there seems to be another giant-sized decision in the Battle of the Buds -- and here's the next installment: Case C 96/09 P Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v Bud? [read post]