Search for: "State v. Duree"
Results 441 - 460
of 55,906
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2024, 6:43 am
In this case, the New York Court of Appeals chips away a little further on eyewitness testimony and holds that the criminal conviction needs to be vacated.The case is People v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am
Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:20 am
v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am
Harlow v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am
Harlow v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am
Harlow v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:44 am
Johnson v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
During this period, multiple restitution efforts have been established. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:49 am
” “During the investigation into one of those seven cases, Fields v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
McCabe (concluding that the classification of marijuana was not rational); State v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am
The FT Group’s Chief Executive stated that it is right, “that AI platforms pay publishers for the use of their material. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:00 am
In an essay here on the blog last week, I discussed Justice Alito's suggestion during the oral argument in the Idaho abortion case that Congress lacks the power to preempt state law by imposing conditions on the receipt of federal funds by non-state actors. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:01 pm
[V]iolent protest is not protected; peaceful protest is. [read post]
5 May 2024, 11:31 am
In Figlio v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 11:09 am
In-custody transportation through the United States Marshals can take many weeks, with long bus rides during which defendants are shackled, and overnight stays are often in county jails and other contract facilities ill-equipped to address the needs of our incompetent clients.This week, however, the Sixth Circuit gave teeth to the statutory requirements of the Speedy Trial Act in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 10:26 am
The briefing cites to Naterra International, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:44 am
If a government official identifies themselves as such on their account, but lacks the authority to act on behalf of the state, there is no state action. [read post]
4 May 2024, 8:31 pm
Seilkop v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 7:00 am
As we wrote recently in our analysis of Reich v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
