Search for: "State v. Elliott"
Results 441 - 460
of 508
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2022, 3:00 am
Employee is one of many who were laid off by employer In Elliott v Advanced Masonry (Ont) Ltd., issues arose when the employer requested that the employee’s claim be dismissed by way of summary judgment. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 3:00 am
Employee is one of many who were laid off by employer In Elliott v Advanced Masonry (Ont) Ltd., issues arose when the employer requested that the employee’s claim be dismissed by way of summary judgment. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 8:11 am
The appeals court agreed that this qualified as a substantial impairment of a contractual relationship under Indiana law, which unlike many state tenure statutes, has been treated as forming “an employment by contract between the teacher and the school corporation” (Elliott v. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:53 am
The $25,000 fine issued by the court in that case, known as R. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:52 am
” Since the Supreme Court’s 1978 opinion in Oliphant v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am
” At American Thinker, Deborah La Fetra maintains that the “Gift Clause[s]” in state constitutions would prevent states from enacting “workarounds” to the court’s recent decision in Janus v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 3:03 am
Chief Justice Steele: The AFSME v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 1:25 pm
Chief Justice Steele: The AFSME v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
McEntyre, Frederico v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 8:16 pm
Supreme Court heard Caperton v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
McEntyre, Frederico v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 7:06 pm
On Nov. 19, circuit judges Henry Lackey, Robert Elliott and Andrew Howorth all told the state Supreme Court they would "awate" the appointment of a special judge to take on the case, Jones v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:36 am
In light of this recent federal enactment, multiple state laws to the same effect, and even public opinion polls suggesting support for the death penalty in such cases, was the Court's decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 8:14 am
(Id. at 260, citing Godfrey v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:06 am
Indeed, the very definition of Promote states that it is “determined under Sections 6.1 (a)(iii)-(v). [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 8:27 am
The case is Banks v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
