Search for: "State v. Jacobs" Results 441 - 460 of 1,842
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2013, 12:52 pm by Rich Vetstein
Jacob Realty Agents Required To Adhere to Dress Code, Mandatory Office Hours The Appeals Court will consider the case of Monell, et al. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
 * Book Review: Sir Robin Jacob tells us a story about "IP and Other Things"Annsley reviews Sir Robin Jacob's IP and Other Things, a 500-page collection of the famous Judge's essays and lectures. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:35 pm by Will Baude
Article III simply declines to abrogate certain State immunities from suit, see Hans v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The claim pursuant to the Judiciary Law § 487 must also be dismissed, as the alleged deceit did not occur during a pending judicial proceeding (see Jacobs v Kay, 50 AD3d 526, 527 [1st Dept 2008]). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
 Floyd LJ has roundly rejected Arnold J's reasoning, stating:58.The difficulty I feel with endorsing this reasoning is as follows. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 7:00 am by Jacob Sapochnick
In this video, attorney Jacob Sapochnick breaks down the new “Lawful Prospective Immigrant Status” category proposed by the U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 7:55 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
So it's always news when the Second Circuit rules that a conviction was in fact unconstitutional, which is what happened here in this homicide case.The case is Orlando v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 4:37 am by Amy Howe
Jacobs previews tomorrow’s oral arguments in Yates v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:34 am by Wells Bennett
Ralls challenged the final order issued by CFIUS (CFIUS Order) and the Presidential Order in district court, alleging, inter alia, that the orders violate the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution because neither CFIUS nor the President (collectively, with Treasury Secretary and CFIUS Chairman Jacob Lew, Appellees) provided Ralls the opportunity to review and rebut the evidence upon which they relied. [read post]