Search for: "State v. Lilly" Results 441 - 460 of 910
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2011, 6:50 am by Andrew Frisch
State of Iowa, 165 F.R.D. 89, 92 (S.D.Iowa 1996) (considering potential prejudice to the defendant and judicial economy), Monroe v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:29 am
The SPC Blog carries a hot-off-the-press piece from victorious law firm Powell Gilbert following judgment in Eli Lilly v Human Genome Science. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 7:35 am
The connection can be based on the residence of the person or a business connection within the territory of a taxing State or a situation within the State of the money or property from which the taxable income is derived;(vi) TDS provisions which are in the nature of machinery provisions constitute an integrated Code under the Act of 1961 together with charging provisions. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm by Josh Blackman
(It is all to common to say that the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 "overturned" Ledbetter v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 2:26 pm
 Finally, there was an analysis of the recent decision of the District Court of The Hague that the Dutch part of Eli Lilly and Company's patent EP 1 313 508 is valid. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
Following Actavis vs Eli Lilly, is the UK becoming more author-centric? [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 5:22 pm
Perhaps the most important suit to-date has been the United States Supreme Court's May 2007 ruling in Ledbetter v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 12:57 pm
Later in the term, the Court ruled on the highly controversial Ricci v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
finding that unregistered design rights are more commonly litigated and have a much higher success rate than registered designs: There's a new IPO report on designs infringement - game-changer or stating the obvious? [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 2:34 pm by Aaron Barkoff
Eli Lilly, the court reaffirmed that written description is determined based on the state of the art as of a patent’s priority date and that evidence which illuminates the state of the art only subsequent to the priority date is not relevant to written description. [read post]