Search for: "State v. Lilly"
Results 441 - 460
of 912
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2010, 7:35 am
The connection can be based on the residence of the person or a business connection within the territory of a taxing State or a situation within the State of the money or property from which the taxable income is derived;(vi) TDS provisions which are in the nature of machinery provisions constitute an integrated Code under the Act of 1961 together with charging provisions. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:06 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 998 F.2d 931, 938 (Fed. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 9:58 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm
(It is all to common to say that the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 "overturned" Ledbetter v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 9:55 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 860 N.E.2d 884, 896 (Ind. [read post]
20 May 2019, 8:00 am
William Harris, as Administrator of the Estate of Lillie Michelet v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 12:55 pm
” White v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 2:26 pm
Finally, there was an analysis of the recent decision of the District Court of The Hague that the Dutch part of Eli Lilly and Company's patent EP 1 313 508 is valid. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
Following Actavis vs Eli Lilly, is the UK becoming more author-centric? [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 5:22 pm
Perhaps the most important suit to-date has been the United States Supreme Court's May 2007 ruling in Ledbetter v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 10:04 am
Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 12:57 pm
Later in the term, the Court ruled on the highly controversial Ricci v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 4:43 pm
In UFCW Local 1776 v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
finding that unregistered design rights are more commonly litigated and have a much higher success rate than registered designs: There's a new IPO report on designs infringement - game-changer or stating the obvious? [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 2:34 pm
Eli Lilly, the court reaffirmed that written description is determined based on the state of the art as of a patent’s priority date and that evidence which illuminates the state of the art only subsequent to the priority date is not relevant to written description. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 2:34 pm
Eli Lilly, the court reaffirmed that written description is determined based on the state of the art as of a patent’s priority date and that evidence which illuminates the state of the art only subsequent to the priority date is not relevant to written description. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:45 am
Forsythe, Clarke D., Abuse of Discretion: The Inside Story of Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:32 pm
Eli Lilly, 577 F. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 9:13 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:16 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 598F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]