Search for: "State v. Perry"
Results 441 - 460
of 2,163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
On appeal to the supreme court of the state, the judgment was affirmed [. . .].'” 1921—Kirby v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
Perry, Judge.Representing Jones: Michael H. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 12:32 pm
Perry v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 3:11 am
Franc Perry the motion is the second of two; the first motion got one set of attorneys out of the case. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 1:52 pm
Judge Walker has ordered that the stay of entry of judgment in Perry v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 7:00 am
See, e.g., Galey, 510 F.3d at 532; Perry v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
§ 2254(d) by readily attributing error to the state court in violation of Woodford v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am
Perry, the Proposition 8 Case). [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
In Perry v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 5:48 am
(That’s the central point of Miller v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
Landry (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 785, 791 [California Supreme Court interpretation of federal law binding when there is “no contrary United States Supreme Court decision” on the issue]; see also Perry v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 8:15 pm
Perry last Wednesday, the U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 4:34 pm
Perry. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
Rick Perry all have the opportunity to stop this miscarriage of justice. [read post]
12 May 2009, 3:39 am
Perry, Judge.Representing Appellant Luhm: Patrick E. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:32 am
The Supremes issued an opinion today in Perry v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:44 am
Schwarzenegger (now Perry v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:34 am
Perry & Ors v Serious Organised Crime Agency and Perry & Ors (No. 2) v Serious Organised Crime Agency, heard 20 – 23 March 2012. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Perry, the case (argued late last month) in which two same-sex couples sued in federal court to invalidate California’s Proposition 8, a voter-adopted state constitutional ban on gay marriage. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 5:00 pm
United States v. [read post]