Search for: "State v. Reagan" Results 441 - 460 of 1,039
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Snapping a remarkable winning streak for plaintiffs challenging state bans, Feldman’s ruling was the first decision by a federal court upholding a state SSM ban since the Supreme Court invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:42 am by SHG
When Orin Kerr noted the unusual opinion out of Fourth District Court of Appeals in Florida in Ruiz v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
   Trump is more likely to represent the degeneration of the Reagan regime than a Republican renaissance. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 12:37 am
Many states (estimates are as high as 30) will make abortions illegal the minute Roe v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:10 pm
Since then, Judge Ginsburg has remained a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:22 pm
The occasion, Stevens' discussion with Cliff Sloan and David McKean, the authors of The Greatest Decision (2009), an excellent social history of Chief Justice John Marshall's landmark decision on judicial review, Marbury v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 7:13 am by Josh Blackman
Noah Feldman Indulges in Gorsuch and Barrett Fan Fiction The "Reagan Revolution" and OT 2021 Five Thoughts on the Timing of U.S. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 11:41 am by Sam Williams
The Reagan administration challenged the constitutional validity of these provisions in Morrison v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 11:15 pm by Florian Mueller
At first sight it appears that Judge Koh had taken everything into account.On the subject of Judge Koh's decision-making, she's just decided to take under submission (decide in writing without an oral hearing) all pretrial motions pending in FTC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:58 am by Marissa Miller
At the Wall Street Journal Law Blog, Chelsea Phipps discusses the prospect that the government may have a more difficult time regulating false or misleading commercial speech in the wake of United States v. [read post]