Search for: "State v. State Board of Finance" Results 441 - 460 of 1,869
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2025, 11:35 pm by Söğüt Atilla
Although the UPC informed the Board that parallel infringement proceedings were pending before the UPC and one of the opponents in the said parallel UPC infringement action filed a notice of intervention, the Board refused to postpone the case and heard it according to the original schedule. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 4:57 pm
Marion County Election Board Freedom of Association State Primary Regulation: New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
Ernst & Young, Inc., 494 U.S. 56 (1990).[1] The Notice states that: The MSRB is publishing this notice to alert municipal market participants that, under existing legal principles described below, certain financings that are called ‘bank loans’ may, in fact, be municipal securities. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
<This piece appeared on RGE Monitor’s Finance and Market Monitor, available at http://www.rgemonitor.com/financemarkets-monitor/256477/todays_financial_crisis_corporate_governance_and_the_issue_of_third-party_liability. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
The majority also stated that it rejected the notion that a proposal’s call for board action rather than management action precludes the availability of the ordinary business exclusion. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 8:54 am by Candace L. Moss
First, the staff discussed the usefulness of companies’ including a discussion of the board’s analysis in their no-action requests under Rule 14a-8(i)(5) and Rule 14a-8(i)(7). [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:16 pm
The internet platform then standing in the role of the state, but the state can go after the enterprise where it fails in its monitoring and controlling functions. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am by Blog Editorial
FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 23 – 24 February 2011 Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; and Belmont Park Investments PTY Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc, heard 1 – 3 March 2011. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:40 pm by Cicely Wilson
All centered on the mortgage finance industry’s practice of naming the Mortgage Electronic Recording System, Inc. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am by Conor McEvily
Adam Cohen of Time previews United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:35 am by Adam Chandler
” The editorial board of the New York Times criticizes the Court’s decision in the securities fraud case Janus Capital Group v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 10:43 pm by Minnesota Lawyers
This changed on February 12, 2008, when the Minnesota Court of Appeals decided State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 6:31 am
The law, scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2023, builds on the State Board of Administration’s August 2022 resolution providing that its own investment decisions must be based only on pecuniary factors that do not include “the consideration of the furtherance of social, political, or ideological interests. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 6:31 am
The law, scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2023, builds on the State Board of Administration’s August 2022 resolution providing that its own investment decisions must be based only on pecuniary factors that do not include “the consideration of the furtherance of social, political, or ideological interests. [read post]