Search for: "State v. Taylor"
Results 441 - 460
of 3,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
” The Appellate Division ruled that Taylor’s dismissal was improper because Taylor was not terminated for the sole reason specified in the settlement agreement: intoxication on the job.________________________ The Discipline Book, - A concise guide to disciplinary actions involving public employees in New York State set out in a 2100+ page e-book. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:24 am
As support for this conclusion, the Court referred to the plain and ordinary meaning of "complaint", how workplace safety laws have been interpreted in other states, how the federal workplace safety law has been interpreted and finally to a prior decision by the Kentucky Court of Appeals, Terminix Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:20 pm
Today, the 5th Circuit clarified a procedural hurdle to that tactic in a small category of cases.In Taylor v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
That case led to some further proceedings and eventually to a new opinion, Taylor v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 5:02 am
State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
STATE V. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 7:54 pm
See Pretka v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 8:10 am
by Sarah Taylor, SpringerLyle ••• In June of 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided an important issue regarding the warning labels on prescription drugs in Pliva, Inc. et al v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 8:22 pm
Griffiths v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 4:15 am
” Robel v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:12 am
Mary SchroederUnited States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 7:13 pm
No. 07-5439 _________________________________ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________________________ RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners v. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 7:10 am
The defendant in Taylor v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 12:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:30 am
Workers v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
Workers v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 9:21 am
(See Lescailles v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
Taylor, No. 94,382 (Kan. [read post]
15 May 2018, 8:25 am
In one recent case, Commonwealth v. [read post]
