Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 441 - 460
of 40,467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2014, 5:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 10:18 am
United States, 556 U.S. 129, 137 (2009), by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, see McKeever v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:34 am
Criminal Trial in United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 10:30 am
United States (D.D.C.): 1 Complaint [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:15 pm
On December 14th, in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 8:22 pm
Pacing Technologies, LLC. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 1:42 pm
Feldman wrote a 1,900 word column arguing that Scalia would have rejected the independent state legislature doctrine, but did not mention that Scalia joined the opinion that endorsed that doctrine. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:50 am
Tompkins and United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 12:03 am
In other words, the world may need Missouri v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 9:12 am
Campbell and James V. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:22 am
The Landmark 1966 decision, Miranda v. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 9:38 am
Ribstein has a thoughtful post on what he calls the "shareholder democracy sham" and how those efforts interface with the "battle for control" (my words) between states like Delaware and the SEC (as well as the federal courts) over... [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:05 am
The order list published this morning by the United States Supreme Court shows that it still has taken no final action on the petition for review in No. 13-449, The Falls Church v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 6:37 am
Reuter v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 2:51 pm
" On remand, the state court can say, "Well, then, it violates provision Z of the state constitution, even though the state and federal provisions are worded the same. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:08 am
From this morning's opinion of the Court in Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:21 pm
Upstream is at issue in EFF’s Jewel v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 4:52 pm
SCOTUS Decision The Brunetti case follows an earlier decision, Matal v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 10:26 am
Arizona V. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 6:38 am
In other words, under more recent Supreme Court precedent, Garcia may no longer be good law.The intervening Supreme Court precedent on sovereign immunity and the ADA is United States v. [read post]
