Search for: "Tax Analysis v. Irs" Results 441 - 460 of 602
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
   And to draw people to that pool, Congress chose an incentive: a penalty for failure to get the insurance, with the penalty calculated by one’s taxable income and payable to the IRS, not just once but until they obtain coverage. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  But the Court returned to a strict interpretation of the ban in 1962, in the case of Enochs v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Fifth, might the Congress repeal section 107, the existence of which is difficult to justify under any sort of tax policy analysis? [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:14 am by Leland E. Beck
The Administrative Law Question:  Hiding under the substantive first question is a critical question of whether a final regulation adopted by the IRS reflecting the IRS’s answer to the substantive question is entitled to judicial deference under Chevron v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Alan Horowitz
Background Generally, the IRS has three years from filing to assess additional tax. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by Emily Chan
Additional Resources: How Did 275,000 Nonprofits Lose Tax-Exempt Status? [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
About a month ago, the Tax Court, in Rodriguez v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The penalty spelled out in the new health care law uses those very words: it is to be collected by IRS just as any other tax penalty is. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Now, an alert reader has pointed out to me that the issue raised in the hypothetical was addressed by the Tax Court in a Summary Opinion in July of this year, Abdi v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 8:40 pm
/sameness of pool of money, determines nondbtr's rts to sue 3d parties. http://t.co/q4zVrh8 B-PA: Absent express lang. in stip, funds escrowed in adeq prot stip for taxes aren't in trust for sec cr or tax body. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:33 am by Gene Takagi
IRS applications for tax exemption - 56% processed within 90 days - based on initial screen. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:38 pm by Will Aitchison
Andrew Frisch has as summary of Norceide v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:33 am by Robert A. Epstein
"As a general matter, the Guidelines specify sources of income as follows: a. compensation for services, including wages, fees, tips, and commissions; b. the operation of a business minus ordinary and necessary operating expenses (see IRS Schedule C); c. gains derived from dealings in property; d. interest and dividends (see IRS Schedule B); e. rents (minus ordinary and necessary expenses - see IRS Schedule E); f. bonuses and royalties; g. alimony and separate… [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:20 am by Venkat
That's right up there with arguing that the IRS is should be abolished and is not properly empowered to levy taxes. [read post]