Search for: "U. S. v. Holder"
Results 441 - 460
of 561
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2011, 5:58 pm
Heller, 554 U. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:17 am
Holder (08-70434) (full opinion available here). [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
S. 47, 58 (2007) (citing Beck v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:38 am
Massey Coal Co., 556 U. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:17 am
In Bank of New York v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:38 am
As Judge Leventhal described MERS in the Court's decision: "'In 1993, the MERS system was created by several large participants in the real estate mortgage industry to track ownership interests in residential mortgages' (Matter of MERSCORP, Inc. v Romaine, 8 NY3d 90, 96). [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:56 am
White, 536 U. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 4:28 pm
The case was filed originally in 1994 as Luck’s Music Library, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:44 am
; Holder v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 5:39 am
U. [read post]
4 May 2011, 6:00 am
Holder. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:15 am
U KNOW WHO YOU ARE!! [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:35 am
,S. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:05 am
(David Post) For those of you interested in this sort of thing or this issue, I’ve written (along with Annemarie Bridy at U Idaho) a “Law Professors’ Amicus Brief” in the appeal (before the 2d Circuit in NYC) in the Viacom et al. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:10 am
In addition, reexamination gives the patent holder an opportunity to respond to new evidence of invalidity by amending his claims. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 7:29 pm
Holder (docket 11-5047), which involves a federal judge’s ruling upholding the new law’s mandate that virtually every American obtain health insurance by 2014. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:58 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 3:59 am
In Ehrenhalt v Kinder; 2011 NY Slip Op 30375(U); February 15, 2011; Supreme Court, New York County ;Judge: Martin Shulman we see how things went bad: "At the time she signed the contract, Shapolsky tendered the contract deposit of $85,000 directly to Kinder. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 3:58 pm
See Doctor’s Assocs., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 10:57 pm
Further, the existence of an investigation report u/s 209A or the pendency of an investigation u/s 235 was not sufficient grounds for refusing to sanction a scheme which was approved by the general body. [read post]
