Search for: "U.S. v. Chambers (robert)" Results 441 - 460 of 515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2017, 9:13 am by Helen Klein Murillo
As Quinta and I explained: Under United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
Maine, 532 U.S. 742 (2000) ...............12, 28 Pope v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Saira Mohamed
The warden then informed observers that the blinds of the execution chamber would be closed; Oklahoma Department of Corrections Director Robert Patton next announced that the execution had been halted because of a “vein failure. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm by Chuck Cosson
“Tool Without A Handle:  A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1]  This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:31 am by Quinta Jurecic, Andrew Kent
But little from the legislation has yet made it through the upper chamber. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:01 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
In contrast, in 2018, Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s consecutive testimony before the House Judiciary Committee and House Intelligence Committee took a combined six hours. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court Says It Can’t Determine Who Leaked Draft Dobbs Opinion MSN – Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 1/19/2023 The U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Shaub
Under well-established principles underlying the U.S. judicial system, by analogy, a motion to dismiss should address only questions of law, not questions of fact—in this case, the question of whether the actions the president is alleged to have committed rise to the level of a high crime and misdemeanor. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am by Molly E. Reynolds, Margaret Taylor
” It was important for the House to enhance the judiciary committee’s subpoena powers in 1974 and 1998 because of the state of the chamber’s rules at the time. [read post]