Search for: "US v. Coats"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,075
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2016, 8:26 am
Center 3700Decided: March 18, 2016The Board reversed here because a "broad general statement" of motivation is impermissible use of a per se rule. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
We never used to read books or newspapers over the telephone. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
We never used to read books or newspapers over the telephone. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
We never used to read books or newspapers over the telephone. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:50 am
Coates v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:59 am
On January 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals issued a decision in AKZO Nobel Coatings, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
Assuming for a moment that the sale of used vehicles could constitute use of a trade mark (which in itself was a difficult question that the CJEU would have to finally resolve), LTC had not displayed genuine use of the Fairway mark.Excerpt from the UKTMArnold J held that t [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm
Quinn Heraty reports on the trademark battle to make us forget SPAM v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:21 am
[Video specimen of use here].Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog note: See any WYHA? [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:04 am
COATS, Mr. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 6:16 am
Additional Resources: EVERYTHING SOCIAL SECURITY: Be prepared when disaster strikes, December 4, 2015, Wicked Local Duxbury, by Kirsten Alberino More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 5:35 am
To date, the chief case to address the workplace marijuana issue is Coats v Dish Network from Colorado. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 6:25 am
Sandra Guerra Thompson's new book, Cops in Lab Coats, which I understand makes an excellent stocking-stuffer. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 4:31 am
Riverdale Mills Corp. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:15 am
This post relates to a brief submitted by 19 law professors, led by Professor Coates, in the case of Friedrichs v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:11 am
Daubert v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 12:25 am
Rex v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
John Coates, John F. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 2:59 pm
Selden and the decision in question is Columbia Motor Car Co. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:42 am
” In Coates, the Colorado Supreme Court held that because the statute uses the term “any lawful activity,” and marijuana is still illegal under federal law, a termination for the use of marijuana (federally illegal) does not violate the statute. [read post]
