Search for: "US v. Rivera-Rivera"
Results 441 - 460
of 562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2012, 1:51 pm
What does that make us? [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:08 am
Geraldo Rivera disse no programa “Fox and Friends . [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
., P.A. v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 10:41 am
Richards v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 7:51 am
Cir. 1980) Rivera v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
MAGARINO, Petitioner, v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Caret v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:09 pm
" Latham v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:44 pm
See section 440.13(3)(d); see, also, Andino– Rivera v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:40 pm
In Rivera v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:54 pm
Rivera, 77 A.D.2d 538, 430 N.Y.S.2d 88 [defendant who commanded his brother to get a gun and pull trigger had complete dominion and control over gun]; cf., People v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:08 am
Rivera v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
In IO Group v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm
Generally speaking, estoppel cannot be used against a state or municipal government (see e.g., New York State Medical Transporters Association v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Zhu v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Zhu v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Judge Fallon found more useful authority in Rivera v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:35 am
Nor may the prosecution use “prior convictions or proof of the prior commission of specific, criminal, vicious or immoral acts” other than to impeach the accused’s credibility (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371 , 374 [ 1974]). [read post]
