Search for: "United States v. Clark" Results 441 - 460 of 1,460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2015, 11:49 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
., (collectively,“Apotex”) appeal from a final judgment enteredagainst them by the United States District Court for theSouthern District of New York. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm by News Desk
FDA asked for the action in the United States of America vs. 24 Cases of Raisin Bran Cereal and J and L Grocery, LLC, and James T. and Lori A. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
He too considered Bonnard v Perryman and Reynolds v Malocco, as well as the hugely-influential decision of Clarke J in Cogley v RTE [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005). [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
 The judge wielded a "broad axe" and assessed the loss of profits at £14.45 per unit x 1,755 units i.e. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:49 pm
Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U.S. 485, 512 (1984) (citation omitted); see also Eckenrode v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:14 pm by Roy Ginsburg
  Regards, Roy] Introduction On January 11, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued what commentators have hailed as a “sweeping” decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner alleged that she was required to perform the out-of-title duty of supervising the entire child support unit without a concomitant increase in pay (see Matter of New York State Corr. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner alleged that she was required to perform the out-of-title duty of supervising the entire child support unit without a concomitant increase in pay (see Matter of New York State Corr. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:29 pm by Dennis Crouch
So what do these cases mean for international patent and copyright exhaustion in the United States? [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 5:31 am by Lyle Denniston
United States — federal court authority to require the government to transfer guns seized from an individual without a legal right to have a gun Tibble v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 6:49 am by Andrew Hamm
Dimaya: Whether 18 U.S.C. 16(b), as incorporated into the Immigration and Nationality Act’s provisions governing an alien’s removal from the United States, is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]