Search for: "United States v. Felt"
Results 441 - 460
of 2,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2009, 7:36 am
The full brief of the United States is available here. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:00 pm
Since the standard of review was "abuse of discretion," the justices felt compelled to defer to the trial judge's ruling, which relied on a 1972 Supreme Court precedent, Neil v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:31 pm
Today, in a short published opinion, United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 12:46 pm
Officers did not have reasonable suspicion at the moment of seizure.In United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:54 am
As it happens my law school is housed in a building named for John Lord O'Brian, a one-time United States Attorney most famous for prosecuting Eugene V. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:15 am
Supreme Court ruled in Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 4:58 pm
United States (Case No. 12-1173, March 10, 2014). [read post]
19 May 2018, 12:09 pm
It would have been preferable to give the Apple v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 5:46 am
In Knight v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:24 pm
In a recent case, Baldonado v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:58 am
On October 15, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its opinion in Jovani Fashion, Ltd. v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:04 am
Assocs. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 3:58 pm
Valeo and Citizens United v FEC) (8) Politically motivated U. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 11:35 am
In New York Times v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
Dean v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am
As evidence, he notes that the Court has released only four opinions thus far, and has still not issued an opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 7:06 am
Janus v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:51 am
United States last Term.) [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
It is established in Strasbourg and domestic jurisprudence that in certain “well-defined circumstances” art 2 will impose “a positive obligation on [state] authorities to take preventative operational measure” to protect the life of an individual (Osman v UK (2009) 29 EHRR 245 at 115). [read post]
