Search for: "United States v. Gay" Results 441 - 460 of 1,627
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2016, 3:30 am by Bethany Berger
Hitchcock represents some of the worst oppression of tribal nations in the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 5:30 am by Bailey DeSimone
Lingering state sodomy laws were invalidated in the 2003 Lawrence v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:51 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The only reason to oppose this bill is as a back-door means of criminalizing youthful gay relations, since after Lawrence v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Impact of Windsor These recent rulings are fueled by the Supreme Court’s ruling last June in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 6:12 pm
The case that made it to the Supreme Court which ultimately led to its overturning is United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:33 pm by azatty
In fact, they got to go to the big show—as a defendant at the United States Supreme Court (Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm by Shea Denning
On Monday, October 6, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari review in Rainey v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:17 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
 And the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit seems willing to play along. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:41 pm
Julius Richmond, a distinguished health care professional who served as Surgeon General of the United States during the Carter Administration. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:21 am by David Oscar Markus
United States, Justice Sotomayor explained that a resentencing court could take into account post-sentencing rehabilitation. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 2:02 pm by NARF
(Tribal Court Jurisdiction; Allotments) United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:58 pm by Amy Howe
  The Justices did not make us wait:  the first opinion of the day came in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:14 pm by Jason Shinn
Instead, in 1998, the United States Supreme Court confirmed that the main federal anti-discrimination law (Title VII, 42 U.S.C. [read post]