Search for: "United States v. Gray"
Results 441 - 460
of 978
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2013, 5:42 am
One employee stated that customers usually noted that it was a gray market unit and asked, and they’d be told that AFL wouldn’t service it. [read post]
15 May 2013, 11:44 am
Sec. 6651(a)(1); United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 12:00 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 7:13 am
Here are some updated materials in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Last month, the United States Supreme Court held in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:28 pm
Gray v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:30 pm
In Costco v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 9:17 am
§ 545 (smuggling) because the archaeological material "are goods or merchandise smuggled, clandestinely introduced into the united States, imported contrary to law .... [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 9:36 pm
Kirtsaeng bought textbooks in Thailand, where they are cheap, brought them to the United States, and resold them at a large profit. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In other words, legally made works can be bought and sold and resold on the “grey” (or “gray” for those not in the Commonwealth) market, according to common sense. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
§ 109(a), must mean “lawfully made in the United States”); see generally P. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:04 pm
Supap Kirtsaeng was a Thai student in the United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 12:02 pm
A word search shows this is only the fifth time a Supreme Court opinion has mentioned the WTO, along with Crosby v NFTC (2000), JEM Ag Supply v Pioneer Hi-Bred (2001), United Haulers v Oneida-Herkimer (2007), and Golan v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
But his list would be a remarkable beginning: (1) Eliminate gerrymandered Congressional districts (which could be done with lawsuits); (2) End the Senate’s dysfunctional filibuster rules (which should have been done earlier, but Democrats got suckered again by Republicans); (3) Adjust corrupt lobbying laws that now unduly favor former members of Congress working for special interests; (4) Aggressively test and re-test the Supreme Court’s Citizen United ruling (Democrats… [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
In Gray v. [read post]
