Search for: "United States v. Michael Stephens"
Results 441 - 460
of 664
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2012, 8:15 am
The fourth quarter of 2011 also saw some very large leveraged buyout transactions in the United States which bodes well for the higher end of the market in Canada, which transactions we have not seen domestically for several years. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:46 pm
I've written about it here: anti-vax lawyer Clifford Shoemaker's legal harassment of Neurodiversity blogger Kathleen Seidel, the British Chiropractic Association's failed crusade against Simon Singh, naturopath Christopher Maloney's feckless SLAPP threat against blogger Michael Hawkins, and even Marc Stephens lawyer-posing against critics of the Burzynski Clinic. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
United States, Carolyn Coleman of National League of Cities describes it as a test of “states’ rights to limit the way undocumented immigrants live in the United States,” while at Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf emphasizes that the case is “at least as much about how to allocate power between Congress and the President as it is about the balance of power between the states and the federal government. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm
Michael E. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
At UPI, Michael Kirkland previews the issues in Reichle v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:29 am
Not surprisingly, this book is waved around by plaintiffs’ counsel in cross-examinations in courtrooms all across the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 6:07 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:17 am
Pritchard (1998), ‘United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
United States (whether a district court may direct that a criminal defendant’s sentence run consecutively with a yet-to-be-imposed sentence that the defendant is expected to receive for a state crime). [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
And Chief Justice Warren Burger once said of him that he could not identify “any judicial colleague more highly qualified to have come to the Supreme Court of the United States than Henry Friendly. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:03 am
Tompkins and Miranda v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:28 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:21 am
Michael D. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
United States, where the high court narrowed the scope of honest services fraud criminal conduct, gutted part of Scanlon’s plea arrangement with prosecutors. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am
Last Friday, Stephen Wermiel discussed the constitutional issues in Miller v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:23 pm
Others much more qualified than I have analyzed the debate, so see these folks for much meatier, more lawyerly analyses:Orin Kerr, Volokh Conspiracy: "Reflections on the Oral Argument in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:12 am
Solicitor General Michael R. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:15 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
