Search for: "United States v. Nixon"
Results 441 - 460
of 842
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2017, 12:30 pm
Because as the too-often ignored case of Nixon v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:30 pm
Because as the too-often ignored case of Nixon v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 6:09 am
Liang, accused of helping facilitate the installation of so-called defeat devices to skirt U.S. emissions testing in about half a million vehicles, pled guilty in September to a count of conspiracy to defraud the United States, commit wire fraud and violate the Clean Air Act.Liang was also fined $200,000, due immediately, more than the $20,000 fine requested by prosecutors. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm
We ran into related issues during the pre-Obergefell litigation on marriage equality, when the United States Attorney General and some State Attorneys General declined to defend the constitutionality of marriage and marriage-related laws that were discriminatory, and other parties (generally representatives of legislative factions and state or local officials) stepped in to do so, with fairly limited success. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 11:41 am
The Reagan administration challenged the constitutional validity of these provisions in Morrison v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
As the unanimous Court said in the 1974 Watergate Case, United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 4:49 am
[v] I don’t think it was even close. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 2:45 am
In late July 1974, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:27 pm
That is one of the central principles of the momentous Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
In the famous Nixon Tapes case, United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:15 am
United States that “the President has the exclusive authority to remove executive branch officials. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 7:51 am
Welcome to Monday, the 43rd anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:25 am
” That memo cites a quote from an 1882 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
” The Constitution provides that the president, like the vice president and all civil officers of the United States, “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
United States and Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:57 am
See Nixon v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:03 am
Workers’ rights and the Supreme Court — Joseph Seiner, The Supreme Court’s New Workplace: Procedural Rulings and Substantive Worker Rights in the United States (Cambridge University Press 2017): Seiner argues that the Supreme Court has systematically eroded the rights of minority workers through subtle changes in procedural law. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I provide a brief summary of the United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:09 pm
As our organization, United to Protect Democracy, pointed out in this memo, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
