Search for: "United States v. Padilla"
Results 441 - 460
of 515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2022, 10:04 am
Americans United Inc. (1974), and Bob Jones Univ. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:25 am
United States (full disclosure — I was on the Chaidez team), the court found Padilla non-retroactive. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm
New York politicians are expected to vote to force the city’s police force to divulge the surveillance technology it uses, one of many reforms of law enforcement being considered across the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 1:26 pm
By Little V. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am
This would create in state habeas law a remedy for lawyers' failure to advised their clients of collateral consequences, following a recent SCOTUS precedent on-point in Padilla v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:45 am
Wegner… In State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
United States, 19-7320, a sequel to Stokeling v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
United States, 14-361, involves a bribery ring in Baltimore under which the owners of a car-repair shop paid police officers to refer to them business resulting from the car collisions to which they responded. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:12 am
” South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 1:15 pm
I never said that, the Supreme Court never said that, and I would never do that as President of the United States. [read post]
29 May 2016, 5:20 am
Yet, his decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 2:28 pm
Cir. 2020)… Indeed, particularly where the statute in question regards such a "severe 'penalty'" as deportation, Padilla v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:44 am
US, which raises the question of whether the Court’s 2010 decision in Padilla v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:59 pm
Sandoval: The Court found that in light of the United States Supreme Court decision in Padilla v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 2:02 am
The Court can only address those legal issues brought before it by States under its contentious jurisdiction or by United Nations organs or authorized agencies seeking an advisory opinion. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:47 am
" Padilla v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 3:04 am
" Padilla v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:02 pm
 "The President," it said, "has no intention of releasing any detainees in the United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm
 "The President," it said, "has no intention of releasing any detainees in the United States. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
United States and Barber v. [read post]
