Search for: "United States v. Padilla"
Results 441 - 460
of 472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2012, 7:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:39 am
For Green's lawyer, the decision from the 3rd Circuit in Green v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
The Padilla Case (Mar. 11, 2003)7. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm
United States New York state’s highest court will consider whether U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 1:46 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 9:16 am
On March 6, Dred Scott v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm
En noviembre, fue asesinada María del Carmen Vázquez, madre buscadora, en Abasolo, Guanajuato. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 12:30 pm
Padilla, which requires anyone detained within the United States to sue their immediate custodian (which, as a result of personal jurisdiction rules, has the effect of all-but requiring the suit to be brought in the district in which the detainee is held). [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 8:16 am
I do not believe that we should participate in this utterly empty gesture.United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
Its attorneys—hired by TSI on a state-by-state basis--never do that. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
” The NDAA therefore leaves open, and does not affect, the unresolved questions raised in the Padilla and al-Marri cases–i.e., whether the AUMF authorizes the long-term military detention of U.S. citizens and lawful resident aliens who are apprehended in the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Two separate classes of landowners are included in the suit as well as the United States. [read post]
22 May 2016, 8:47 am
In Hickey v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 4:23 pm
” On the other side of the balance, the judge noted the government’s interest in detaining those who “actually pose an immediate threat to the national security of the United States during ongoing international conflict” and ensuring [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:50 pm
That is one way that the Constitution-in-practice (as opposed to your or my particular vision of the ideal Constitution) tends to stay in sync with the center of political power in the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2006, 8:32 pm
In its landmark case Gideon v. [read post]
