Search for: "United States v. Windsor"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,003
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2010, 5:00 am
Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913 (2005) (downloaded files copied from servers or directly from peer-to-peer network); United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:28 pm
Carhart, and its decision earlier this summer in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 2:23 pm
Judge Kelly is so far the only jurist in state or federal court since United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 1:46 pm
Windsor, which struck down portions of the Federal DOMA but left state DOMAs intact. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
Like Chief Justice Roberts during oral argument in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
The directive was created as a result of United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 4:10 am
In Borman v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:15 am
Supreme Court held, in United States v Windsor, that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)–which defined “marriage” as “only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife”–was unconstitutional. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:34 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 6:26 pm
Sims, and from United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:27 am
Perry; Kevin Russell of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C. was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
Evans’s understanding of equality in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:19 am
This week's Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
And the Court’s ruling in Windsor v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 1:13 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:50 am
Baez, who was a citizen of the United States, was gainfully employed. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 8:30 am
By June of 2013, when the Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:09 am
The following day, in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:52 am
Evans and United States v. [read post]
