Search for: "Unpublished Disposition" Results 441 - 453 of 453
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Further action stayed pending disposition of Berkeley Hillside Preservation. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 3:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
This wouldn’t be dispositive and anyway the harms will already have been caused in litigation. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Again, this assumption is often either pretermitted for purposes of lodging a dispositive motion, conceded, or included as part of the challenge to an expert witness’s opinion’s admissibility. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm by Schachtman
Professors Michael Green and Joseph Sanders are two of the longest serving interlocutors in the never-ending discussion and debate about the nature and limits of expert witness testimony on scientific questions about causation. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Addressing AIR’s four CEQA challenges to the project EIR, the Court held: (1) that use of a 2007 “existing conditions” baseline was supported by substantial evidence and complied with CEQA, in light of the refinery’s current entitlements and history of fluctuating operations; (2) in an issue of first impression, that the project’s compliance with California’s GHG cap-and-trade program supported County’s conclusion pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §… [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
This is Part I of VII of a brief recap of some the significant environmental law and administrative cases decided in the past few months: I. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm by Bexis
  There wasn’t because the court found that there was no outcome-dispositive conflict. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:37 am by Arthur F. Coon
  On project opponent Marina Coast Water District’s (“MCWD”) cross-appeal, the Court held that County’s decision not to require a subsequent EIR and its statement of overriding considerations were both supported by substantial evidence and (in an unpublished portion of its opinion not further discussed here) that County’s approval did not violate its own general plan. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 9:48 pm
You'd probably expect that two guys whose idea of recreation includes commenting on drug and medical device product liability litigation would be members of the American Law Institute - and you'd be right. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 7:28 am by Leah Samuel
[This guest post from Yale Law School student Leah Samuel—the third post in our FTC UMC Rulemaking symposium—is a condensed version of a full-length paper. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 2:02 am by Joe Sanders
These results replicate those of Prescott and Rockoff 2008, an unpublished but widely circulated study on multiple states' worth of data. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
The Interplay between the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause: Is the Supreme Court’s Test for “Public Use” Merely Rational Basis? [read post]