Search for: "WIT ASSOCIATES, INC. v. US " Results 441 - 460 of 1,232
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2017, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
The SCC found a section 7(a) violation[3] based on a warning notice in a magazine following settlement of an infringement case against a bra wire customer, and warning letters to a customer: You are hereby advised that unless you inform us within the week that you will immediately cease and desist from the manufacture, sale and use of such flat arcuate wires for use in brassieres, you will leave us with no other alternative but to forward the matter to my Canadian… [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 4:47 pm by Stephen Page
A very useful illustration of whether it is necessary to join a third party is the case of Budiarta and Zavahir [2016] FamCA 923, a decision of Forrest J. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
  Comments and suggestions (especially for compiling a useful student friendly reading list) gratefully received as this remains very much a work in progress. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:45 pm by Heather Douglas
Although affidavits based on information and belief that fail to state the source of the information are not struck out automatically (see Carevest Capital Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:46 pm by Schachtman
Griffis helpfully narrates the Supreme Court’s evolution in Daubert and then in Joiner, but he fails to address the serious mischief and devolution introduced by the Court’s opinion in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:34 am by Schachtman
Most of the dust observed from brake drums is composed of resins used to manufacture brake linings and pads. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Prior association breeds trust, and trust can be efficient. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am by Schachtman
Perineal talc use at baseline was not associated with later ovarian cancer. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 1:15 am
The answer to this was not entirely satisfactory IMHO - essentially, it was argued that the problem to be solved needed to be defined broadly enough to allow several closest prior art documents to be considered.On the use up period, the BGH explicitly referred to the UK decision Navitaire Inc v EasyJet Airline Co Ltd (No. 2) [2005] EWHC 282 (Ch), [2006] RPC 4 for the proposition that injunctive relief should only be denied if it is "grossly disporportionate". [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
Pryor has participated in many decisions associated with death penalty petitioners (writing 28 reported decisions by our estimation), far too many for us to describe here in any detail. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 6:28 am
Multiple witnesses testified that they knew Lewisbey from Indiana gun shows and knew that he used a fake Indiana I.D. to illegally purchase guns. [read post]