Search for: "WORTHY v. UNITED STATES"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2016, 4:08 am
Bush appointee to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
Each author is well regarded in their field, and I think each of their assessments is worthy of serious consideration. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 10:49 am
In fact, the proposed consent decree in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:11 am
Though their targets are different, constitutional extremism on both the Right and Left is united in the privileging of the powerful. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 8:45 am
Judge Pryor, joined by Carnes, starts his order respecting the denial of rehearing this way (background here):A majority of the Court has voted not to rehear en banc our decision in this appeal, United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:48 am
In State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:46 pm
The voting was as follows: In favour: Algeria, Benin, Burkina Faso, China, Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Cuba, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Morocco, Namibia, Pakistan, Philippines, Russian Federation, South Africa, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Viet Nam Against: Austria, Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Montenegro, Republic of Korea, Romania, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, United Kingdom of Great Britain and… [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 1:19 pm
The case provides a victory to Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, after a series of setbacks in the form of unfavorable decisions in the aftermath of the Second Circuit’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 2:30 pm
United States, will certainly be appealed. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:57 am
This presents a unique opportunity worthy of further exploration. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:38 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie argues that, although Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s pledge to reverse the effects of the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 12:42 pm
That applies as much in Marxist Leninist states (to which the essay is directed) as it does in theocratic states (the clerical elite) and Western states (the socio-economic-political elites). [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:18 am
Richard Katskee is the Legal Director at Americans United for Separation of Church and State. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
United State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 1:49 pm
Humphrey and that he is in fact qualified to be President of the United States with all of the powers that entails. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 5:23 am
I should note that, in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 5:07 am
” The foreign government must have adopted “procedures to minimize the acquisition, retention and dissemination of information concerning United States persons subject to the agreement. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
Citing Robinson v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 11:16 am
See Jacobellis v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm
MC: Yes, I think we have got the balance wrong largely because the cause of action remains a 19th century tort at its core, untroubled by reforms of the kind which have caused the law to evolve in places like the United States, the United Kingdom, and even dear old New Zealand. [read post]
