Search for: "Wait v. Second Judicial District Court"
Results 441 - 460
of 611
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2019, 9:43 am
One example of this is in J.I.R.L. v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, where the Divisional Court reviewed an appeal of a decision by the CICB in relation to the quantum of his claim. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 9:50 am
The Court of Federal Claims ruled in favor of the class in Barker v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 1:19 pm
I can’t wait to see what the Texas Supreme Court does with that one. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm
This week, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
As a result, the case does not directly address the question now presented—whether a legislature’s prescribed timeline can be judicially overridden.Perhaps the most directly relevant case is Valenti v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
Kahle Tests The Waters The year after the Supreme Court opinion in Eldred was handed down, a district court in California attempted to apply the newly-minted “traditional contours” test. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm
But the Court returned to a strict interpretation of the ban in 1962, in the case of Enochs v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
District Court for the District of Columbia considered—and rejected—President George W. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:30 am
” Gibbons v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson V. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson V. [read post]
13 May 2021, 2:24 pm
In January 2021, the Special Master overseeing the Valeant class and opt out litigation recommended to the district court that it dismiss a direct action brought by a hedge fund that waited to file its direct complaint until after the court had issued its order preliminarily certifying the class for a proposed $1.2 billion s [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:46 pm
Because the district court’s improper finding of probable cause supported its decisions to dismiss the complaint, we reverse the district court’s judgment and remand the case for trial…. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm
But wait a minute. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
District Court Judge Matthew J. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:47 am
I was reading his opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm
Fittingly, the case on their docket that day is one of the biggest of the year: Trump v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 12:48 pm
This leads me to my second point.2. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 6:17 pm
On May 2, 1990, Davenport was charged with rape in the Riley County District Court. [read post]
