Search for: "Ward v. United States"
Results 441 - 460
of 699
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 11:18 am
The provision empowers the president to “suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens” if he “finds” that entry “would be detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:54 am
That is the question before the justices on Wednesday morning, in Lynch v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Two weeks before the 1888 election, Republicans released a forged letter, allegedly from the British ambassador to the United States, stating that Cleveland was the preferred candidate of the British Empire, leading the Irish community in New York to abandon Cleveland’s campaign. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:33 pm
Second, we were able to demonstrate that our client was experiencing great hardships without her fiancé in the United States. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:02 am
Trujillo-Castillo appealed and the Seventh Circuit remanded the case in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 5:16 am
Trial practice » United States. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 3:23 am
” United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Lopez-DeLeon, No. 06-41553 A sentence for illegal reentry is affirmed where defendant's prior California conviction for sexual intercourse with a minor qualified as a "crime of violence" within section 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, as documents established that the victim in that matter was under the age of 14. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm
" As the City noted in its brief, "[h]istorically black colleges do not discriminate, for instance, by establishing programs to 'disproportionately appeal to' black students, provided they are 'open to all on a race-neutral basis' (quoting United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 9:02 am
In Ward v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:01 pm
at *15 (quoting United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:32 pm
; Stewart v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:06 am
EmulexAfter a trial and post-trial motions, the United States District Court for the Central District of California de- termined that Emulex Corporation (Emulex) infringed Broadcom Corporation’s (Broadcom) U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 8:20 am
To ward off disputes over agreed-upon terms, it is very important that those terms be put into writing, signed by both parties. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
United States, 14-8358, won a grant after just one relist. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:05 am
See Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 6:06 pm
In the meantime, I will provide my unfrozen caveman lawyer synopsis of the case.United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:33 pm
This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.? [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 11:00 pm
Further, at paragraph 20 of its statement of claim, that: ...inasmuch as the end result is to provide the names, age, sex, photographs, address, unit, ward, town, local government, state etc of voters, the process and the combined application of the means of achieving this, serious infringes on the said process and application of the Plaintiff’s patents for the compilation and production of the Voter’s Register. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:31 am
What the Court said in Galloway v. [read post]
