Search for: "Watt v. Watt" Results 441 - 460 of 809
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Horatia Muir Watt is Professor of Law at Sciences Po Law School I. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Mel Watt Introduces Free Market Royalty Act | http://t.co/MZXGZkAYKa http://t.co/3WUXzv9XGF -> Defining and Demanding a Musician’s Fair Shake in the Internet Age http://t.co/QwWuOtAMgh -> Holding exclusive right to sue does not give standing to enforce copyright VISION v JOHN DOES SD Ohio 2013http://t.co/OOEsi4S1td -> Defendant in bittorent infringement action not entitled to anonymity MALIBU MEDIA v Doe SD Indiana 2013http://t.co/Lx0BezsVTR ->… [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Although afforded the opportunity, the father failed to even allege a sufficient change in circumstances and, thus, the court properly dismissed that petition based on Matter of Watts v Watts. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 3:40 pm
Phillip Watts Enter., Inc., 560 So.2d 339, 341 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 9:45 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 125946 (WD KY, Sept. 3, 2013), a Kentucky federal district court allowed a Jewish inmate to proceed with his claim that his free exercise and RLUIPA rights were violated when he was forced to shave his head while in segregation, in violation of his religious beliefs.In Watts v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 7:12 am
This conception of the human as homo fabulans (or story-telling animal) could lead us to outline a 'Critique of Narrative Reason'.Click here to purchase paper Recovering the Lost Human Stories of Law: Finding Mrs BurnsDawn WatkinsAbstract: This paper adopts a narrative approach as a means to investigating a well-known English civil law case; Burns v Burns [1984] Ch 317. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 8:30 am by Joy Waltemath
Watts thought the EEOC was really “feeling its oats” and pushing the envelope, if the allegations are true. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:13 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
” “The decision was also a direct rebuke to the EEOC and its ‘nebulous definition’ of a ‘supervisor,’” Watts added. [read post]