Search for: "Williams v. Stevens" Results 441 - 460 of 1,459
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2017, 12:40 pm by Amy Howe
Suggesting that it “would be an understatement in the extreme to call the Supreme Court’s decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at Moore v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
North Carolina, a case I’ve been following closely — my students Jeremy Page, Mike Romeo and Sydney Sherman, and I filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting the petition for Supreme Court review, filed on behalf of professors Ashutosh Bhagwat, Richard Garnett, Andrew Koppelman, Seth Kreimer, Lawrence Lessig, Sanford Levinson, Robert O’Neil, David Post, Lawrence Sager, Seana Shiffrin, Steven Shiffrin, Geoffrey Stone, Nadine Strossen, William Van Alstyne and… [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
”Similarly, in his 2005 opinion for the Court in Kelo v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” In The New Jersey Law Journal (registration or subscription required), Steven Sanders discusses Beckles v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:49 am by Victoria Kwan
From July 19 to 23, Justice Alito, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and retired Justice John Paul Stevens participated in a New York University Law School conference in Barcelona, Spain. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am by Marci Hamilton
The majority in Smith was written by Justice Antonin Scalia and drawn from the Court’s more conservative Justices: William Rehnquist, Byron White, John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O’Connor, and Anthony Kennedy. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 6:08 am by Mark Rienzi
Justices Stephen Breyer, John Paul Stevens, and David Souter recounted this history in their dissenting opinion in Zelman v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:17 am by Hannah Smith and Luke Goodrich
” And four Justices who only recently departed from the Court (William Rehnquist, John Paul Stevens, Antonin Scalia, and David Souter) joined them in condemning the anti-Catholic history of Blaine Amendments. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 8:04 am by scanner1
CIVIL – DECLARATORY JUDGMENT DA 15-0641, 2016 MT 167, STEVEN LOW, VINCENT HARKER, JUDY WALTERS, FREDERICK WALTERS, THOMAS GILDAY, SANDRA HARKE, JOHNSON TESTAMENTARY TRUST, ECHO SKILPADDE TRUST, AND WILLIAM BURTON, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:32 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court issued a five-to-three opinion in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]