Search for: "X Corp. v. Doe" Results 441 - 460 of 670
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
General Motors Corp., 463 F.2d 98, 100 (2d Cir. 1972) (“bare bones statement. . .without any supporting facts permits dismissal”); Jackson v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 10:53 pm
Cases reported in English for the first time are * Starbucks Corp v Photiades Foodstuff Suppliers (District Court of Nicosia, Cyprus): the ETMR's first ever report of a case from Cyprus, and quite an amazing dispute in which a powerful international company has to struggle to gain the upper hand against a resourceful and mischievous infringer whose "CHINO frappechino" coffee vending machines were ultimately held to have infringed the FRAPPUCCINO trade mark;* A… [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
The CJEU rules in comparative advertsing case Lidl SNC v Vierzon Distribution SA (IPKat) Improved procedure for Euro-PCT applications (Kluwer Patent Blog) EU – Ministers fail to agree on EU patent (EPLAW) (ip:jur) (IP Osgoode) More protected names for EU foodstuffs (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) ECJ to rule on criteria for registration of position marks: X Technology Swiss GmbH v OHIM (Class 46) Osama kin back in brand equity play? [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court articulated the modern extraterritoriality test in two alcohol price-affirmation cases in the 1980s.[14] Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm by Bexis
Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945) (where the defendant wasn’t very “international”), and World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
This point again is correct, but the Manual does not come to terms with the challenge often made to what I call the assumption of stochastic risk. [read post]