Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 4581 - 4600 of 9,559
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Lisa Girdwood, Brodies LLP
The Hague Convention has the force of law within the United Kingdom by virtue of CACA 1985, s 1(2). [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:28 pm by Steve Sheinberg
 35 If the Court adopts Bot’s reasoning, safe harbor may fail in the employment context. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 12:30 pm by John Ehrett
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 15-41Issue: Whether 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Pursuant to § 355(j)(2)(B), the ANDAdefendants notified Shire of the Paragraph IV certifications.In response, Shire sued the ANDA defendants forinfringing the asserted claims, along with certain otherclaims not at issue in this appeal, under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:03 pm by Dan Flynn
The two men were on the witness stand for about 10 days of last year’s 35-day trial and are credited with the detailed construction of the government’s case against the other three defendants. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 4:29 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
“Everything” is awfully broad and yes, it really does mean everything. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 11:47 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The bottom lineAccordingly, we conclude that amended claim 1 is not“substantially identical” to original claim 1. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:22 am by Dennis Crouch
Thus, amended claim 1 is not “substantially identical” to original claim 1 because original claim 1 encompassed scope that amended claim 1 does not. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 9:16 am by Scott Brinkman
As a result, if you are caught with less than 35 grams, it is a Class A Misdemeanor (which can come with up to one (1) year of jail time and a $1,000 fine); if it is more than 35 grams, then it is a Class C Felony (in which case the maximum jail sentence is up to seven (7) years and a $5,000 fine). [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 8:17 pm by Bill Marler
A misdemeanor conviction under the FDCA, unlike a felony conviction, does not require proof of fraudulent intent, or even of knowing or willful conduct. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 7:22 am by Bill Marler
A misdemeanor conviction under the FDCA, unlike a felony conviction, does not require proof of fraudulent intent, or even of knowing or willful conduct. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:39 am by Arina Shulga
Conversely, information that does not condition or arouse the public’s interest would be acceptable. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 8:57 am by Altman & Altman
The Whistleblower Act also does away with the $35 million cap on fines for automakers that purposely delay recalls. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  To be sure, the value investor “does not believe that the market price accurately reflects public information at the time he transacts. [read post]