Search for: "Hill v. State" Results 4581 - 4600 of 5,134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06  OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” Professor Tushnet spends a good amount of time examining the deconstruction of the administrative state (pp. 147-163). [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:58 am by Emma Snell
Mychael Schnell reports for The Hill. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 4:29 am by Emma Snell
Ellen Mitchell reports for The Hill. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
While Microsoft has stated it’s extending this offer on the basis few claims are likely to succeed,[21] it also indicates that Microsoft believes there will be some claims that survive to settlement or even to judgment, and for which it would be optimal for Microsoft to control the litigation (rather than its customer). [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 11:35 am by admin
  Brookline and Beverly Hills are moated castles that keep out their larger metropolitan riffraff. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Elizabeth Martinez
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Royal Brush Manufacturing v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 5:07 am by Beatrice Yahia
An independent integrity panel has called for Biden to take disciplinary action against Department of Homeland Security Inspector General Joseph V. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm by Elie Mystal
She never argued that, because legacy preferences are hereditary, they presented a “suspect” classification that should be judged by the “strict scrutiny” standard under the amendment’s equal-protection clause.The district-court judge in the case, Rosenstock v. [read post]