Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 4581 - 4600
of 18,453
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2016, 3:39 am
The IPKat posted a report earlier this week of the case Hospira v Cubist, in which three patents belonging to Cubist were revoked by Mr Justice Carr. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 6:44 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada rendered it judgment in Cowper-Smith v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 8:03 am
We're open to suggestions and requests. [read post]
3 May 2018, 5:02 am
Blanding, In re Austin, Commonwealth v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:45 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia is (in)famous in patent circles for calling patent law “gobbleydegook” during the KSR v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 8:51 am
Shelia Jackson Lee has re-introduced HR 40. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 11:18 pm
See In re Salomon Analyst Metromedia Litig., 544 F.3d 474 (2d Cir. 2008); Oscar Private Equity Invs. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 2:17 am
See also Burson v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:10 pm
CITY OF CRESSON, No. 08-0143 IN RE SCOTT ASHTON, DPM., AND ASHTON PODIATRY ASSOCIATES, P.A., No. 08-0183 TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY, FIRST CHOICE POWER, INC., AND TEXAS GENERATING CO., L.P. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 9:36 am
Whitewater v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:01 am
At one point, Justice Breyer observed, “I worry we’re in an arcane area of the law. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 11:46 am
On July 19, 2023, in Progressive Democrats for Social Justice vs. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
I predict we will never know because, and here's the real point, I do not believe anyone is conducting a real investigation aimed at finding out the truth.4) Justice Gorsuch Lying about the Praying Football CoachIn Kennedy v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 4:06 am
Copyright © 2007-2017 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 1:01 am
They're not much necessary in the easy cases and in the hard ones are either to vague or too rigid.And the rules of privilege and confidentiality and client secrets (those are actually different categories of things, though they clearly bleed into one another) are especially problematic. [read post]
21 May 2015, 7:55 am
Monday’s decision in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:43 pm
In re C. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 3:26 pm
Nothing wrong with that - if you're in Europe.For a good, old-fashioned take on Rule 29 motions and the American adversarial system of justice (including some plain talk on what the government's burden really means) revisit United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:24 pm
But I agree with Justice Liu when he says -- responding to a different hypothetical -- that just because lines may be somewhat arbitrary doesn't mean they're wrong. [read post]
