Search for: "Kennedy v. State"
Results 4581 - 4600
of 8,224
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2012, 10:12 pm
Gates ["Al-Maqaleh II"] and Hamidullah v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 12:22 pm
Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 11:56 am
(Counsel in black robes preparing for Supreme Court oral argument - with apologies to the IPKat)All eyes will be on the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) on Monday, October 29, 2012 when it will hear oral argument in the immensely important case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 7:01 am
In 1999, Judge Robert Pratt of the Southern District of Iowa, a courageous jurist whose brilliant opinion in Gall v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 5:02 pm
The prior decision on the perpetrator's appeal is United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 12:31 am
With the recent health care decision, National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled in Filartiga v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled in Filartiga v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
Romney was taken to task for this mindset in 1994, when he tried unsuccessfully to unseat Senator Ted Kennedy. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 4:40 am
" Robinson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 4:51 pm
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, U.S. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:17 am
A case titled Escobedo v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 9:16 pm
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 12:50 pm
The focus is likely to return to Justice Kennedy, especially in the context of his opinion in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 7:04 am
Kennedy, 668 S.E.2d 666 (Ga. 2008)). [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 12:52 pm
United States, No. 11-597 (cert. granted Apr. 2, 2012). [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 12:35 pm
In Farias v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:39 am
Justice Kennedy wrote the dissent again for the same Justices two years later in the five-to-four ruling in Bullcoming v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 10:40 am
One of the key questions at stake is whether Section 5 imposes a heavy burden on the states (an important step in evaluating whether Section 5 is “congruent and proportional,” to use the City of Boerne v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:40 am
Filed under: Alien Tort Statute Tagged: Alien Tort Statute, Harvard University, Kiobel, New York City, Supreme Court, United States, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit [read post]
